Kontrak Berjangka Emas
Diupdate

PRS LIVE 4.4 I DON'T THINK WE GET TO 2050-2060

247
I THINK IT'S 2000-2015 (FOR XAUUSD). NOTE THAT THIS CHART IS GC1!.

So this much I know right now: This buying came from futures, not spot or GLD. If I judge based on GC1!, I would say new high possible. If I judge based on XAUUSD, I would say lower than 1990. If I judge based on GLD etf, I would say gray route or worse. The truth is somewhere in between.

Am I still targeting 1695 (by 9/04), and 1670 (9/25). YES. The longer this takes to finish this third top, the more ridiculous the move to 1670.

I WILL REMIND FOR THE LAST TIME: If your trades take 3 days or less, PLEASE FIND A TACTICAL TRADER TO FOLLOW. I AM NOT A TACTICAL TRADER.

Catatan
PIVO PICTURE FOR THE BIG 3:

cuplikan
Catatan
IF you use volume for any of the three instruments [by itself] to judge where price is going, please don't take this the wrong way: you don't know what you are doing. This is because the [source] of the move on any given 3-day window, can be any one of them, the least likely being GLD until post COVID-19. Nowadays, when not being the source, it can be the game changer.

I layer my PIVO (Pham Infinite Volume Oscillator) like I do PIRL/PIMA. Since GLD is an etf that trades 6.5 hours, it has its own set of adjusted layering to get the same information. So why is futures the strongest? The bottom 3 layers are still stacked ascending-ly. While spot only has 2 layers and so does GLD with an even weaker black layer. Each of them describe money flow on respective periods.

I can get different looks by switching bars sizes. After looking through all the angles, PRS is committing to the long for at least 4 more days.
Catatan
Note: that means 1939 long for spot.

Pernyataan Penyangkalan

Informasi dan publikasi tidak dimaksudkan untuk menjadi, dan bukan merupakan saran keuangan, investasi, perdagangan, atau rekomendasi lainnya yang diberikan atau didukung oleh TradingView. Baca selengkapnya di Persyaratan Penggunaan.