Summary: The Reserve Bank of Australia only checked a couple of the boxes in its shift in the direction of tightening overnight, far short of where the market has priced the central bank to head with its policy rate in the coming year, but how much should the market care when it feels as though central bank guidance is loosing its sway? Elsewhere, rapidly flattening yield curves and lower long US yields are a boost to the yen, which is gaining broadly today ahead of the FOMC meeting tomorrow.
FX Trading focus: RBA dovish, FOMC preview, JPY thoughts
RBA goes dovish – but what is a trader to do when the market can supposedly front-run future policy shifts? The Aussie lower after a dovish performance from the RBA. Yes, the central bank made a shift in the tightening direction and abandoned its yield-curve control of 0.10% out to April of 2024, but this was merely a recognition of the market breaking the control policy ahead of the meeting. More disappointing for the market’s more hawkish tilt, the RBA said in its very extensive statement that it would wait until February on whether to do anything with its still heavy pace of AUD 4 billion per week in QE, a far more dovish stance than the RBNZ (abandoned in July) or even the Bank of Canada (abandoned last week). The statement also outlined an extensive and rather strange prediction that inflation outcomes would prove lower in Australia than elsewhere even as the outlook has improved, reminded that wage rises are a key component of when the bank will actually move to hike rates, and was only willing to open up the possibility that the original time frame of 2024 may shift forward into late 2023. The AUD was of course lower in the wake of this, but given that markets are feeling increasingly comfortable with challenging central banks’ guidance nearly everywhere, it is hard to say whether we can extract sustained Aussie weakness from this decision. Another development that is also Aussie negative is the ongoing dump in coal and iron ore prices in China.
Chart: AUDJPY The Aussie was weaker on the dovish RBA, with weak metals and coal prices also weighing to a degree – but the move over the last 24 hours in AUDJPY isn’t all down to Aussie, but also the JPY, which is firmer as long US treasury yields have pressed lower and the yield curve flattens. Plenty more downside needed in most JPY crosses (perhaps 82.00 here) before we can call this a reversal of the recent rally move, but lower long yields certainly challenge the narrative and are a strong support for the JPY, though for it to fire on all cylinders, we would likely need weak risk sentiment, particularly in EM credit to combine in the mix.
Big test for market themes on the FOMC tomorrow. As discussed in yesterday’s update, this week’s FOMC is an important test of how much stock the market puts in Fed guidance, as much as it is an exercise in wondering what the Fed will actually deliver tomorrow. The Fed is seen as the central bank most behind the curve in bringing policy tightening, relative to what is unfolding in the US economy. It is supposedly set to launch a ponderous asset purchase tapering move this month that will be followed, only on the completion of that tapering to zero, by eventual rate hikes further down the road. The base case for the pace of tapering was laid out in the September FOMC meeting at a sedate 15B a month (110B less per month of treasury purchases, 55B less of MBS purchases) which would require a long eight months to complete. But pre-declaring that pace without forward flexibility is a dangerous bit of forward guidance, requiring an embarrassing backtrack if inflation and earnings jump further in next few months (See the risk already here in the great discussion of “trimmed mean” inflation in a recent opinion piece from John Authers) Given all of the embarrassing tripping over prior guidance we have seen under the Powell Fed since the early 2019 about-face from tightening to loosening policy, and now as “transitory” seems to be leaving the Fed’s vocabulary, the Fed may try to provide as much flexibility as it can on how quickly QE will wind down. So the range of options is perhaps: 15B to start plus flexibility as the base case, with no flexibility indicated the unlikely dovish outcome, and a more rapid pace of 30B the most hawkish conceivable guidance. Then we shift to whether to how the market actually prices Fed actions in the wake of what they deliver: thumbing the nose at the USD in the belief that no matter what the Fed is saying, it will stay behind the curve relative to other central banks and relative to inflation risks (i.e., no real improvement prospects for real US rates), or expressing the belief that the Fed and other central banks are risking having to hike rates and upsetting the economic growth outlook and especially financial markets and therefore committing a “policy mistake” as the market beast needs ever more stimulus to continue higher. Some of the latter may be why yield curves are flattening as aggressively as they have recently, with the longest treasury yields actually dropping.
The latter have been brought significantly forward, with the market now pricing the Fed to move approximately twice by the end of next year. Just as with the ECB and as discussed in the RBA preview above, will the market really care what degree the Fed adjusts its guidance, given that guidance seems worth very little and that data outcomes are in control here, not the Fed? I’ll provide more thoughts tomorrow and/or Wednesday, but one idea could be a starting pace of tapering 15B/month, but pre-declaring “flexibility” that could see the pace even doubled if necessary if inflation/wages/job growth make a mockery of Fed caution in the coming couple of months.
NZD on the move lower in Europe today. The FX Board is off-line due to technical difficulties – hope to have that back as soon as possible. NZD traders should note the important data up late today from New Zealand as AUDNZD traded near the locally pivotal 1.0400-25 zone today. The big bounce in the latter and the sell-off in NZDJPY suggest that NZD longs are a bit crowded ahead of these data. With markets second guess all of the dovish central banks, does that also mean that the most hawkish central bank suddenly seems far less as we have to discount all guidance now, don't we?
Disclaimer
The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.
Informasi dan publikasi tidak dimaksudkan untuk menjadi, dan bukan merupakan saran keuangan, investasi, perdagangan, atau rekomendasi lainnya yang diberikan atau didukung oleh TradingView. Baca selengkapnya di Persyaratan Penggunaan.